andykemp.org.uk

There are lots of good online Word Processors out there but at the end of the day they tend to all just offer a subset of the features of a locally installed Word Processor.  So imagine my surprise to find such a fully featured system independent web-based Word Processor which offered something new! (loosely web-based – it is Java based and looks like it uses Web-Start technology)…

What WriteOnline does that makes it really special is it offers graduated support for those who find writing difficult.  For example it supports writers by reading-aloud individual words or sentences.  It offers a clever prediction engine that attempts to predict what you are trying to type (including phonetic spelling – i.e. type in ‘fiz’ and it will offer words like ‘physical’ etc.)

In addition to this it supports multiple word-banks depending on the task at hand and writing-frames (i.e. sentence starters).  One particularly clever feature was the ability to create Mind-maps and then use the completed mind-map to create a word-bank which can be used to write the essay.

All in this looks like an excellent tool to scaffold learners who find writing difficult (for whatever reason – young students, SEN, EFL etc).  The tool can be accessed from any computer and also includes a version that can be installed locally (where internet connection might be an issue such as a laptop).

A nice feature is the Moodle integration which allows you to create an activity which specific wordbanks etc within moodle.  Students then complete the writing in WriteOnline (which can be saved as a draft to Moodle) and then submit it for marking.

All in this definitely looks like a tool worth some consideration!

To get a better idea of what WriteOnline offers I thoroughly recommend having a look at their Video Demos

Having been a long time TabletPC user I have always been a bit sceptical about the benefits of IWBs relative to their high costs, but this last year I have had access to a SMART board in my classroom which I have found really enjoyable. I am still mostly a TabletPC user and still do most of my A-level/IB teaching sitting at my desk, however with lower school classes the IWB can be really useful – but it is still very expensive for what I use it for…

The problem with IWB boards for many schools is that most teachers use them as glorified projection screens and rarely if ever use the ‘interactive’ element making the costs unjustified! So when I saw the interactive DLP projector on the TI stand at BETT I was blown away. Rather than attempting to explain how it works I suggest you watch this:

Basically it enables you to use the ‘pen/wand’ both directly on the board or at a distance.  The accuracy is pixel perfect (and there is no calibration ever!) and it works on any surface with no other hardware!?!  All in these are likely to retail for around £1,000 which is MUCH less than a projector and IWB!

For those needing a mobile IWB this is the perfect solution as the projector also included DisplayLink technology (which is what I use in my Toshiba DynaDock) which means you only need to plug in a single USB cable and you get Video/Audio(via projector) and IWB elements instantly (again with no calibration!)

Also they offer a wireless connection over UWB where you plug in two USB wireless dongles and you get all of the above only wireless which would be fantastic with my tablet PC!!

This technology is likely to appear in a number of projectors from different manufacturers over the coming months but the one on display at the stand was the:

InFocus IN3902/3904

Keep an eye on this technology I think in a few years you will see this in lots of classrooms as old projectors need to be replaced (particularly in the Independent Sector where IWB are still not widespread) with the current type of IWBs being reserved for users who specifically need ‘touch’…  Time for the IWB market to do some innovating!!

Strange experience this week seeing myself in the Guardian.  I was asked to do a quick telephone back in November interview as part of an article about the launch of the new TI-Npsire Activities Website called NspiringLearning.  Then a few weeks later they sent a photographer down who spent 20mins with one my classes taking pictures.  The journalist wasn’t sure exactly when it was due to be published but thought sometime in January…

I had meant to keep my eye out for it, but the first I knew about it was when a friend emailed me in the afternoon to say he had seen my picture in the paper!?!  Anyway all in it was a fun experience!

If you want to read the article you can find it below:
Professional development: how can we cope with a fast-changing ICT schoolscape?

Apparently the supplement it was published in was also handed out in all the BETT bags on Friday!?!

After a discussion on twitter this afternoon with @daibarnes and @moodlefairy  abut how to best maintain enrolments in moodle – See ETRU Point 6 http://edtechroundup.wikispaces.com/07.06.09 for the original question…

Anyway this led me to thinking about the various options on how we could use groups to separate users within a single course.  But as moodle currently has no option for sitewide groups (on the roadmap for 2.0) so groups must be manually created for each course which is a significant amount of work!!  There are some options to create an populate a course for each class within your MIS, or hacks like the CLEO SIMS hack which enables you to use SIMS groups.

However outside of these there seemed to be no obvious solution.  Then I rememebered that the bulk upload user system can be used to enrol students in groups and wondered if it could also be used to populate the grouping of students and it turns out you can!

If you create a csv file in the following format:

username, course1, group1, course2, group2, etc
user1, TestCourse, GroupA, AnotherCourse, GroupB
user2, TestCourse, GroupA, AnotherCourse, GroupC
user3, TestCourse, GroupB, AnotherCourse, GroupA

etc...

Where user1 is the students username, TestCourse is the shortname for the course and groupA is whatever you want to call the course.

Then when you go to the bulk upload user tool, change the setting to ‘update user’ rather than ‘create new user’ and away you go!

You can use this method to either create new users and enrol, enrol users in a course and group, create a new groups and add new users, or just add already enrolled users in a pre-existing group.  If a student is already in the group then it will just leave them there…

Note:  This will not remove any enrolments or groups students are already in (even if they are already in a group on that course) so you may end up with students in multiple groups.  As a result I would probably suggest you use this to do your initial enrolments at the start of the year, but then manually adjust during the year…

Anyone know a better way?

A few weeks ago following a conversation between myself and @warwickrobotics about who runs the VLE in different schools, and the concept of a director of e-learning I decided to put together a google form to explore this question…

I am very grateful to the 48 people who took the time to respond and I hope the information that I gathered is useful to other people as well.  All responses were anonymous…  Part way into the survey it became obvious that it would have been useful to know a little more demographic information (independent, state, secondary, primary etc) so this question was added in but sadly wasn’t included for all responses.  So what did we find out?

Read the rest of this entry →